We studied the US imaging findings of lipomatosis of nerve and macrodystrophia lipoma in three patients.
Three patients were seen at three affiliated institutions with an enlarged digit. They all underwent US, subsequently followed by an MRI study.
The nerves showed marked enlargement and extension over a length of 9–16 cm. Digital branches were always involved. The appearance on cross section was an enlarged hyperechoic endoneurium with inlying thickened and hypoechoic fascicles. On transverse images this resulted in a ‘chocolate cookie’ aspect and in the long axis a ‘spaghetti-like’ image.
The US appearance of lipomatosis of nerve, not unlike MRI, is rather typical. With US, care should be taken in areas that are more difficult to assess as the sole of the foot, or where the ‘chocolate cookie’ appearance is not so obvious, such as the digits.
Macrodystrophia lipomatosa is a rare condition of unknown origin. It manifests as benign overgrowth of fibroadipose tissue, and bone in a digit or digits. This is most often associated with a peculiar nerve tumor, lipomatosis of nerve also previously termed fibrolipomatous hamartoma [1, 2, 3, 4].
Lipomatosis of nerve is discussed by Enzinger and Weiss as a tumorlike lipomatous process involving peripheral nerves and their branches. Many previous case series have described the imaging of this condition [1, 2, 3, 4]. To our knowledge, only a limited number of reports discussed ultrasound findings [5, 6, 7].
Diagnosis of the various tissue proliferations is mostly made on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). US can, however, also evaluate these changes and especially the nerve enlargement, which is as we believe also typical on ultrasound.
We describe the ultrasound findings in three patients we encountered in clinical practice with lipomatosis of nerve causing macrodactily.
In three affiliated institutions we encountered three patients with this condition. We present these three cases of MDL associated with fibrolipomatous hamartoma, in two cases involving atypical peripheral nerves. To the best of our knowledge, we did not find a report of ulnar nerve involvement. Ultrasound was performed in the patients. Findings were then subsequently correlated with MRI.
US imaging studies of three patients (two men and one woman) were obtained from three institutions. State of the art US systems were used using a 14 MHz or higher probe (Aloka F75; Canon Aplio 800). The patients were then subsequently imaged with MRI. Patient one and two were imaged using a Siemens 3-T (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) and for patient three a GE 3-T (GE, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) was used. We analyzed clinical presentation and findings and morphological features on US and MRI including: size, shape and margins of the lesion as well as relationship to neighboring structures, the amount of fatty proliferation in the nerve, surrounding muscles, bones, and subcutaneous tissues.
The data from our study are presented in Tables 1 and 2. The patients were 5, 15, and 30 years old. The sites of nerve involvement were the ulnar and median nerve, and the medial plantar nerve in the foot.
|PATIENT||AGE||SEX||AFFECTED NERVE||CLINICAL SYMPTOMS|
|1||5||F||Median nerve and digital branches for digit 3||Swelling of the palm of the hand and third finger, absence of pain|
|2||30||M||Medial plantar nerve and digital branches for digit 1||Macrodactyly first toe, unable to wear shoes|
|3||15||M||Ulnar nerve and digital branches for digit 5||Macrodactyly 5th finger, no pain|
|PATIENT||SIZE||EXTENSION||OTHER FINDINGS||OTHER EXAMS|
|1||Length 9 cm; transverse diameter 1.5 × 0.5 cm||From proximal of the carpal tunnel into the digital nerves (digit 1,2 and 3)||Thickening subcutaneous fat and skin||US: ‘Spaghetti-like’ and ‘Coaxial cable-like’ appearance|
|2||Length 16 cm; transverse diameter 1.8 × 1.6 cm||From proximal medial plantar nerve into the digital nerves (digit 1 and 2)||Thickening subcutaneous fat and skin hypertrophic bone structures (metatarsal and phalangeal bones)||US: excessive subcutaneous fat. Thickened nerve showed coaxial cable and spaghetti aspect|
|3||Length 16 cm; transverse diameter 1.5 × 0.9 cm||From distal forearm into the digital nerves (digit 4 and 5)||Enlargement of subcutaneous fatty tissue||US: ‘Spaghetti-like’ and ‘Coaxial cable-like’ appearance|
US demonstrated the increased subcutaneous fat as well as hypoechoic streaks indicating an increase in fibrous thickened septations in the soft tissues. Lipomatosis of nerve (fibrolipomatous hamartoma) was shown as a generally rounded structure (Figures 1, 2, 3). In the short axis fatty proliferation was hyperechoic and the nerve fascicles had a hypoechoic appearance. The fascicles were thickened, somewhat irregularly, compared to normal nerve fascicles. Of note, some difficulty was encountered in the sole of the foot due to the more limited penetration by the foot skin, and the poor differentiation from surrounding fat that is prominent in the sole of the foot (Figure 2). The delineation of the nerve from adjacent tissues was also rather poor, and no true capsule was seen. This made the diagnosis quite difficult in for example the digital branches (Figures 1 and 3). We prefer to describe the transverse appearance rather as ‘a chocolate cookie’ aspect given the presence of irregular shape of the fascicles. This appearance was less obvious in the digital branches, rather an increase of hyperechoic fatty tissues in the expected location of the digital nerves was seen (Figures 1 and 3). Also, beyond the carpal tunnel, and the MTP joint, the nerves became more oval, somewhat flattened, and the coaxial cable like appearance was less obvious. The nerves tended to show a course in multiple directions. In the long axis, the nerve was also seen to present a marked thickening. The endoneurial fat was also hyperechoic, and the fascicles were hypoechoic. For this appearance the MRI derived description of ‘spaghetti-like’ image was suitable (Figures 1 and 2). Nerve enlargement over a distance of 9 – 16 cm was seen. All the three patients demonstrated extension of the lesions into the digital nerves.
MRI confirmed the excess fibrofatty and bone tissue (Figure 1). The fibrous strands within the fatty tissue were seen as low-signal-intensity linear streaks on PD-w images. The thickened nerves were also seen, exhibiting characteristics as described in the literature [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7].
Lipomatosis of nerve (or fibrolipomatous hamartoma) and macrodystrophia lipomatosa is an uncommon tumorlike process of peripheral nerves. It is characterized by an increase in all mesenchymal elements, particularly fibroadipose tissue, but also bone. The area of predilection is the median nerve [1, 2, 3, 4]. There is no gender predilection.
The disorder is congenital in origin, but not hereditary [1, 2, 3, 4]. The exact etiology of the disorder is unknown. There are three probable mechanisms: abnormal nerve proliferation, abnormal blood supply or trauma .
In this paper, we focused on the US diagnosis of lipomatosis of nerve [5, 6, 7]. The appearance of fibrofatty tissue in the digits in macrodystrophia lipomatosa has been described previously on radiography and MRI.
In our study the patients presented with an enlarged digit, without pain, but obviously with a disfigured cosmetic aspect and problems for wearing shoes in patient 2.
In our series the tumors were quite large both in short and long axis with a length of 9 cm in one patient and 16 cm in the two other patients.
On US the increase of fibrofatty tissue occurred predominantly in the enlarged digits. Increased septations were seen in the subcutaneous fat. The nerves were seen to be markedly thickened. Endoneurial fat was increased with a hyperechoic aspect, whereas the nerve fascicles were also enlarged but with a hypoechoic aspect. The fascicles are not unlike those seen in a normal nerve, except thickened, but the increase in endoneurial fat is normally not observed. Of note the nerves are not markedly encapsulated. Not unlike the findings on MRI, the short axis view could be compared to a coaxial cable, although we prefer the ‘chocolate cookie’ term, and the long axis view to a ‘spaghetti like image’ (Figure 4). In the digits this appearance was less obvious and an increase in fatty tissue was seen in the expected location of the nerve. The thickened fascicles were less obvious in this location. Also, in the sole of the foot the thickened nerve could potentially be overlooked by the poorer penetration of US in the foot.
Overall, our findings show similarity with described MRI findings of lipomatosis of nerve .
Other conditions can cause macrodactyly and enlarged limbs or nerves. Lipomatosis of nerve is however not seen in these diseases. US features of these conditions have also only been sparsely described, most descriptions involving MRI. Neurofibromatosis type 1 with plexiform neurofibromas is probably the most common condition coming to mind. The aspect is quite different. The neurofibromas have a clustered hypoechoic cystic aspect along the course of the nerves. In Klippel Trenaunay vascular overgrowth causes the enlarged limb but as mentioned the overgrowth is limited to vascular structures, which can be documented with doppler US.
Our study has some limitations. First, the investigation was conducted at three institutions, and a systematic approach was absent, each MSK radiologist using his own examination technique. However, all radiologists were experienced in MSK US. Further, our series was limited. However, this is an uncommon pathology. Nevertheless, the US features were consistent, although location and extend was variable. Also, the US and MR systems were different, but all were state of the art. We also did not use panoramic US imaging which could have been useful. We did not have any histological analysis, but surgery with these lesions is not so typical as the nerves would have to be sacrificed, resulting in neurologic deficits [9, 10].
The diagnosis of macrodystrophia lipomatosa is generally not difficult although some conditions exist also causing an enlarged limb. If lipomatosis of nerve is associated on US a ‘chocolate cookie’ or ‘coaxial cable’ aspect can be seen in the short axis and a ‘spaghetti like’ appearance in the long axis, findings not unlike MRI. Care has to be taken to identify the process in digital branches and in difficult locations, such as the sole of the foot.
In conclusion, we describe the US appearance which one should be aware of to make a correct diagnosis. In the transverse plane the endoneurium is hyperechoic and there are inlying hypoechoic fascicles. In the long axis a spaghetti like image is seen.
The authors have no competing interests to declare.
Prasetyono TO, Hanafi E, Astriana W. A Review of Macrodystrophia Lipomatosa: Revisitation. Arch Plast Surg. 2015 Jul; 42(4): 391–406. Epub 2015 Jul 14. PMID: 26217558; PMCID: PMC4513046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2015.42.4.391
Upadhyay D, Parashari UC, Khanduri S, Bhadury S. Macrodystrophia lipomatosa: radiologic-pathologic correlation. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2011; 1: 18. Epub 2011 Mar 22. PMID: 21966615; PMCID: PMC3177416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2156-7514.78264
De Maeseneer M, Jaovisidha S, Lenchik L, Witte D, Schweitzer ME, Sartoris DJ, Resnick D. Fibrolipomatous hamartoma: MR imaging findings. Skeletal Radiol. 1997 Mar; 26(3): 155–60. PMID: 9108225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002560050212
Azeemuddin M, Waheed AA, Khan N, Sayani R, Ahmed A. Fibrolipomatous Hamartoma of the Median Nerve with Macrodystrophia Lipomatosa. Cureus. 2018 Mar 9; 10(3): e2293. PMID: 29750134; PMCID: PMC5943032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2293
Xu P, Lu B, Deng HP, Mi YR, Yin CX, Ding Y, Shao XZ, Zhang GS, Xiu XF. Ultrasonographic Diagnosis of Lipomatosis of Nerve: A Review of Ultrasonographic Finding for 8 Cases. World Neurosurg. 2020; 139: e730–e736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.04.116
Elsaidi GA, Wiesler ER. Lipofibromatous hamartoma of the median nerve: case presentation of MRI, ultrasound, electrodiagnostic, histologic, and surgical findings. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2004 Oct; 33(10): 514–6.
Whittle C, Schonstedt V, Schiappacasse G. Fibrolipomatous hamartoma and its ultrasound diagnosis: case series and review of the literature. Ultrasound Q. 2014 Dec; 30(4): 282–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000051
Plaza JA, Kazakov DV, Casas G, Requena L, Sanmartin O, Kacerovska D, Michal M, Schmoranzova A, Suster S, Sangueza M. Fibrolipomatous hamartoma of the nerve: a clinicopathologic report of 13 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Apr; 70(4): 736–742. Epub 2014 Jan 27. PMID: 24480457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2013.10.002
Prabhu A, Anil R, Kumar N. Fibrolipomatous Hamartoma of the Median Nerve: An Outcome of Surgical Management in Six Consecutive Cases. Niger J Surg. 2020 Jul–Dec; 26(2): 153–158. Epub 2020 Jul 27. PMID: 33223815; PMCID: PMC7659758.
Okechi H, Dimostheni A, Kerscher SR, Gugel I, Bevot A, Schaefer JF, Schuhmann MU. Fibrolipomatous hamartomas of the median nerve in infancy and early childhood-imaging hallmarks, symptomatology, and treatment. Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Apr; 177(4): 567–573. Epub 2018 Jan 30. PMID: 29383435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-018-3100-7